Wednesday 5 June 2013

10 O’clock Live

As always, life and laziness have got in the way of blogging.  I have also decided to drift away from the more overtly political blogging, quite frankly because there are people who do a much better job than me, they research and everything In a sort of farewell to the politics side of things, I thought I’d talk about Channel 4’s irreverent political show 10 O’clock Live.  For those not in the know it is a show which mixes humour and satire with political discussion fronted by Lauren Laverne, Charlie Brooker, Jimmy Carr and David Mitchell.  10 O’clock Live initially started life in 2010 as the one off “Alternative Election Night” on Channel 4, a show designed to give a more light hearted take on the live election proceedings.  At the time I surfed between this and the regular BBC coverage and while the BBC was still the best the alternative was a welcome break, particularly early on when not much was happening and the Channel 4 presenters, after the polls closed naturally, could have a bit more fun than their serious counterparts.

The Alternative election night was obviously a success because later that year Channel 4 commissioned 10 O’clock Live, essentially the same show but covering topical news instead of an election.  Many were initially unimpressed, and indeed I was rather annoyed that they had put the show up against Question Time.  As a devoted Question Time tweeter this meant that I ended up watching on a repeat or +1.  The show itself was a mixed bag.  It was obvious that most of the presenters were not used to live TV, Jimmy Carr is a bit of a Marmite comedian at best and they didn’t have much of an idea what to do with Lauren Laverne.  I have to admit that when that series ended I expected that would be the last we would see of this show, however in 2012 it returned.
The show seemed to have been streamlined quite a bit, with several items dropped, one which I wish they had kept was David Mitchell’s interviews.  While Mitchell was definitely not an attack dog like Paxman or Humphries, I actually liked his interview style, essentially, he knew he wasn’t going to get the better of these people, and didn’t go out the way to humiliate anyone, however his easy going style allowed him to often surprise a guest with a comedic barb or even a well placed question.  In all that time Mitchell still appeared like a reasonable man asking reasonable questions and I think this could have grown.

Again, after series 2 finished I thought “It’s gone now” but it is back for 2013 with some improvements.  Most of Jimmy Carr’s skits have gone, and he now just does his regular review of the week stand-up routine.  All the hosts have only one segment, and in fact poor old Lauren Laverne doesn’t generally get a segment at all, a shame as her guides to various events and her piece on Serco were actually one of the better bits.  What has been added is much more round table discussion between the three hosts and this actually works really well and was something that was inexplicably kept to a minimum in the last two series.  I will still say that David Mitchell does not chair a debate particularly well (Perhaps Laverne would do better) and the new skit with a fake American news anchor is pretty dull.  However overall the show continues to improve.
I’m glad Channel 4 will give successful one off or event shows a go as a regular programme.  (See “The Last Leg” as another example) and they also do seem to have the commitment to refine the format, drop what isn’t working and improve on what is.  A couple of more tweaks and 10 O’clock live will become must watch TV.

3 comments:

  1. It's no longer appointment to view TV for me and I think I enjoy it all the more as a result. It is a bit hit and miss but I've enjoyed what I've seen this time round....

    ReplyDelete
  2. I generally try and catch it, although it still has issues that persist. I do like that they've tried to shake up some of the segments, although generally it comes down to Jimmy Carr's week in news, Charlie Brooker's rant, and them all sitting around the table for me. Most of the other segments end up being pretty skippable.

    The bit for me that we always fast forward though is David Mitchell's panel segment. It seems to always consist of having at least one or two overly shouty people, who dominate the whole thing while simultaneously looking like pillocks. The end result is usually pretty unsatisfying as its usually a topic where a proper debate would actually be pretty interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  3. cherryoncake

    It was never really appointment to view TV, but Channel 4 make catchup really easy. Our general viewing time was on the friday repeat. It is improving.

    Alan,

    I've generally been critical of Mitchell's panel segment, and this season it was nearly always uniformly bad, whether putting Katie Hopkins on Tv at all, or the really bad one where Christine Hamilton looked like the reasonable one. However out of no-where was the final segment, which is well worth catching. Essentially David baddiel, Richard bacon and a Lawyer specialising in social media cases discussing whether people should face criminal charges for saying things on-line. Each allowed the other to speak, points of view were exchanged and it was a really good debate. Sadly so often they put on at least one shouty nutter in the interests of "Good Telly" Yes Question Time, I'm looking at you as well.

    ReplyDelete